Messaggioda behrajan » 15/04/2004 - 09:58
continua ad essserci qlc di poco chiaro
ho visto gli highlights che sono gratuiti su MLB TV
ed il cronista dice chiaramente wins by two
mi sembra strano che ci siano stati tanti errori di interpretazione da parte dei cronisti
forse c'è stata qualche interferenza di fensiva per cui l'arbitro ha dato un single
il commento ufficiale:
The hit was initially ruled a ground-rule double, making the final 11-9, but was changed to a single for the one-run victory.
il comitato ufficiale da' ragione a mello
Scoring by the book: With the score tied, 9-9, Wednesday in the bottom of the ninth and the bases loaded, Joe Crede's game-winning hit took a bounce in the outfield and went over the wall. Was it a ground-rule double, knocking in the runners from third and second? After some deliberation in the press box, a call was placed to the Elias Sports Bureau to determine the appropriate official ruling.
Elias ruled that as soon as Crede's drive landed and the winning run scored, it would be credited as only a single that brought in one run. There are no multiple-RBI situations in that particular scenario unless the ball actually cleared the fence in the air for a home run. The final score thus was 10-9.
meraviglia ancora che fior di cronisti abbiano cappellato
la sola differenza fra un capriccio ed una passione eterna è questa: che il capriccio dura un po' più a lungo(Oscar Wilde il ritratto di Dorian Gray) O'tiempo se ne va e tu non vuoi chiavà (squallor)
